On Friday, Judge Netburn rejected the New Yorker magazine’s letter request to release a sealed deposition of former NYPD commissioner Ray Kelly, in a case brought by Muslim officer who sued Mr. Kelly and New York City for discrimination but lost on summary judgment. She found that she lacked jurisdiction to grant the request because the proper procedural vehicle is a motion to intervene under Rule 24 — which the District Court cannot address while an appeal is pending:
Continue Reading Judge Netburn Refuses New Yorker Magazine’s Request for Ray Kelly’s Deposition Because Appeal Divested Her of Jurisdiction
First Amendment
Judge Schofield Rules that State Courts Should First Interpret a Lobbying Law under First Amendment Challenge
In an opinion yesterday, Judge Schofield invoked so-called “Pullman”-abstention and thereby declined to rule on a case raising a novel state question. The case is a constitutional challenge by PR firms to a New York law requiring lobbyists to make certain disclosures. The firms argued that an advisory opinion by state regulators could…
Judge Castel Denies Injunction Against Enforcement of “Ballot Selfie” Ban
Today, Judge Castel denied an attempt to enjoin the enforcement of New York’s Election Law § 17-130, or the so-called “ballot selfie” ban. Judge Castel found that the state’s interest in protecting against voter fraud and intimidation by preventing voters from revealing the content of their ballots (even if through Instagram) was a reasonable First Amendment restriction:…
Continue Reading Judge Castel Denies Injunction Against Enforcement of “Ballot Selfie” Ban
Sixth Circuit Echoes Judge Castel’s Timing Concern in Refusing to Immediatly Enjoin “Ballot Selfie” Ban
In an opinion this afternoon, the Sixth Circuit refused to block Michigan’s “ballot selfie” ban, and, in doing so, echoed the very same concern from Judge Castel on Wednesday (covered in this post, immediately below), about delay in bringing suit:
One hundred and twenty-five years ago, Michigan enacted a law designed to protect the
…
Judge Castel Expresses Skepticism of Delay in Application to Enjoin “Ballot Selfie” Ban
On Wednesday, a new complaint sought a TRO and preliminary injunction against a law banning so-called “ballot selfies” on the ground that the law violates the First Amendment. According to the complaint, “Taking a photograph of a filled out ballot is a powerful political statement that demonstrates the importance of voting. Without the photograph, the…
Judge Stein Dismisses Citizens United’s Challenge to New York’s Charity Reporting Laws
Today, Judge Stein dismissed claims by Citizens United challenging New York’s reporting requirements for charities in the state (see our previous coverage here). Citizens United challenged the New York Attorney General’s requirement that charities file an un-redacted Schedule B, a form listing the names and contribution amounts of the charity’s donors, before receiving a license to solicit contributions in the state. Judge Stein found that the complaint did not allege that that law failed to advance important government interests :…
Continue Reading Judge Stein Dismisses Citizens United’s Challenge to New York’s Charity Reporting Laws
Judge Seibel Rejects First Amendment Challenge to Local Law Requiring Price Labels on Supermarket Goods
Last week, Judge Seibel dismissed a First Amendment challenge to a Dutchess County law requiring retail supermarkets to clearly post prices on each item using a sticker, tag, or other label. The plaintiff claimed that changing the price tags on items each time the store held a sale was an improper burden on the store’s First Amendment free speech rights. Judge Seibel disagreed – and questioned whether price tags on grocery items constituted speech at all.
…
Continue Reading Judge Seibel Rejects First Amendment Challenge to Local Law Requiring Price Labels on Supermarket Goods
Judge McMahon Issues Injunction Allowing Subway Ads About Muslim Documentary
In a decision today, Judge McMahon granted a preliminary injunction allowing subway ads about a humorous documentary called “The Muslims Are Coming!” The ads included statements such as: “The Ugly Truth About Muslims: Muslims have great frittata recipes,” and “Muslims invented Justin Timberlake.” One reason the film producer (a company referred to as VQP) chose to advertise in the subway was to respond to certain pro-Israel ads that a group called “ADFI” had also run in the subway system — ads that were subject to their own litigation issues (see our prior post here).
Judge McMahon rejected the MTA’s argument that it neutrally applied its policy against advertising that is “political in nature,” and emphasized that the ads were not “political” merely because the subject matter was Islam:…
Continue Reading Judge McMahon Issues Injunction Allowing Subway Ads About Muslim Documentary
Second Circuit Upholds New York’s Credit Card Surcharge Ban
The Second Circuit this morning upheld New York State’s ban on credit card “surcharges.” Judge Rakoff had earlier found (see our coverage here) that the law, § 518 of the General Business Law, likely violated the First Amendment because it imposed criminal penalties for calling extra credit card fees “surcharges” but allowed merchants to offer the equivalent price via a “discount.” The plaintiffs argued that the term “surcharge” was a more effective way to discourage credit card use by conveying the real costs they impose on businesses and customers.
The Second Circuit rejected this argument because it construed the law as applying to conduct — charging more than the sticker price — not to labels:…
Continue Reading Second Circuit Upholds New York’s Credit Card Surcharge Ban
SDNY Blog Returns as Steptoe Blog
The SDNY Blog is relaunching as a publication of Steptoe & Johnson LLP. We expect to post several times a week on decisions and other developments in the Southern District of New York. You can find us right here at www.sdnyblog.com, or follow us on Twitter or Facebook.
Here’s a quick summary of what’s been happening in the Southern District while we were away:
- Judge Berman vacated the NFL’s four-game suspension of New England Patriots quarterback Tom Brady for his alleged role in deflating footballs used during the 2015 AFC Championship Game. Judge Berman concluded that “Brady had no notice that he could receive a four-game suspension for general awareness of ball deflation by others or participation in any scheme to deflate footballs, and non-cooperation with the ensuing Investigation.”